The most common problems are the hardest to correct，It is also a reason to make mistakes，The following 8 problems are what we often encounter in quality management。When the following error no longer appears，At least it means that the internal is in place。 Mistake one：After rework, the product will no longer be re-inspected during the inspection process，Bad was found，After being reworked by suppliers or production reindustries，There shouldn't be any more problems，LESS INSPECTION OR DIRECT PASS。There are many times，The heavy workers sent by the supplier are not serious about their work，I want to go back early，Or go out and have fun after heavy work，outcome，There are a lot of materials that you don't even look at，Some of the boxes are not open in the middle。And when the inspector goes to inspect，Thought that the supplier was all reworked，Symbolically spot check it，Just post the PASS，Let the supplier's people go，As a result, it was still subject to production complaints after it was launched：来料不良 因此，For the supplier's reworked products，The inspector should also re-inspect the material in accordance with the inspection requirements，When the test is found to be defective，Ask the supplier to rework，Until the inspection is qualified。 Error two：procurement、business、Technical Department、The production said that this can be put，So I put it to know，The basis of the inspector's inspection is the inspection standard，There are drawings for inspection standards、Acknowledgment、Inspection standards、samples and much more；If it is found that it does not conform to the standard，You should be the one to confirm to your superiors。And not other departments said yes。Management of inspectors、The performance appraisal is all in the quality department，Since you listen to other departments，Then you can just transfer to other departments。 There have been cases like this before，The inspector inspects the material as a non-standard，Procurement said，This does not affect，I said hello to the production line，They are willing to produce，Won't complain about you，The results inspector did not report to his superiors，Directly affix the conformity mark，Go into production。Leads to production line complaints、Stop the line，Procurement will not take on this responsibility。 When the material causes production troubles，Other departments will only ask the inspector how he did it，I don't blame people in other departments。The result of the failure is only borne by the inspector。So，If the inspector finds that there is a defect，The decision can only be made by the direct supervisor，When the boss changes the judgment and allows the acceptance，The reason for the reversal must also be indicated on the adverse report。 Mistake three：我以为 当检验员未做到把关的职责时，Ask the reason for the loss of control，Always start by saying, "I thought."…..Someone who is an inspector should not say, "I thought."”。When you're saying "I thought".，You start to make excuses for your mistakes，Make excuses，I made excuses and then did it again。again，If you encounter a problem and cannot be confirmed，should be directed first，Superior consultation、Confirm。therefore，I ask my staff after making a mistake，Can't say "I thought",All I want to know is why this failure is and what you are going to do in the next test，in order to do a good job。For example:In this test, I did not use the right sampling method，Here came 6000 of them，There are 5 pallets，200box，According to the requirements, 32 boxes should be sampled，An average of 6 cases per pallet were sampled;Draw 6 per box;And I only inspected one pallet，A total of three boxes were inspected。Defective products are not concentrated on this pallet，As a result, I didn't get it。Follow-up I have to follow the standard inspection and sampling method to spot check Error 4：With experience，There will be no problems with this material，Exemption from inspection is a common mistake made by veteran inspectors，I'm glad to be，The inspector is able to bring the job to a close，Know the focus of the inspection，But the method is not right。It's been a problem，It can be tested less，However, it is not exempt from inspection，At the very least, the outer box identification should be checked、Take a product for a full inspection。usually，For products that don't have problems，The first box and the mantissa box must be inspected。such，At the very least, it can ensure that there will be no batch problems in the material。 This manufacturer (squad leader) has a good relationship with me，Yesterday I bought water to drink，Give me back a cigarette，Forget about the bad this time，PASS。This is a big no-no for inspectors，It happens in general companies。Just because of giving face to friends，As a result, I got myself trapped。When you put this batch of defects, cause the customer to inspect the goods and return them、Causing trouble on the production line，so，The first thing the superior asks is how you tested，Why can't I see this problem? Just because of a face problem，It is not advisable to cause losses to the company。 Mistake five：This issue was changed last time、Special picking，I won't open it this time，Sticking PASS directly sometimes，Because the material is in a hurry to go online，There will be a lot of reversals，This leads the inspector to mistakenly believe that this phenomenon can be accepted。The same problem was found during the second inspection，I won't open an order，After going online, it leads to production complaints。The boss will change the judgment and the boss will consider it，It depends on the actual situation，Some communicate with customers，Some communicate with production、Pick and choose, and so on，are limited to this batch。So，After the discovery of non-conformity，Although the last batch was commuted，But it should be billed in the same way，reject。 Error six：Missed items because the material is urgent，procurement、The production department is urging，So，There are still a few items that should be inspected that have not been inspected，I think there should be no problem，Label PASS online。per company，Due to the timeliness of procurement and other reasons，Basically, there are urgent problems，The materials that are eager to go online are purchased and urged to inspect the material speed of the inspector，produce、The warehouse staff waits for the inspector to inspect the materials，Immediate delivery，This causes a lot of psychological pressure on inspectors who are not very experienced。Due to panic，Some of the test items are not checked，It is directly labeled with PASS and put into production。As a result, there is a defect in the items that have not been inspected，Penalties for production shutdowns。The urgent part is usually purchased one by one, and the phone calls urge the supplier to produce quickly，As long as the procurement can be carried out within the specified time，I don't care about other quality issues，Supplier in order to be able to deliver normally，Desperately rushing to catch up，How good will the quality of the materials produced be? The more urgent it is, the more carefully it must be checked。Usually urgent materials are more likely to have quality problems。 When the personnel of the purchasing or other relevant units urge the inspector to hurry up the inspection，Ask them to go to the designated area and wait，The inspector should complete all the inspection steps as required，Confirm that there are no defects before putting them on the production line。If defects are found during the inspection, the relevant personnel should be notified in time to deal with them。 Error seven：After the problem is found, it is no longer inspected according to the process, and an undesirable phenomenon A is found during the inspection process，After billing，Processed (reworked、Special collection, etc.) was found to be defective B after it was put into production。Inspectors carry out inspections in accordance with inspection procedures，The general inspection sequence is packaging、appearance、Mechanism size、Performance checks。There are many times，When the inspector finds a defect，The inspector is pleased，Stop the inspection，Issue a non-conformance report immediately。This was in the previous quality management work，I suffered a lot of losses，When the inspector finds that the appearance is defective (scratched)，In a hurry to produce，Procurement special procurement is in the production process，Another problem was discovered：Size issues，无法组装. therefore，Inspector during the inspection process，If it is found to be defective，All bad items should also be inspected，Record the test results，Wait until the inspection is completed before billing。 Error eight：Forget it this time，One more thing，It's better to have less Most inspectors don't like to make bad reports，Of course, the supplier prefers it，Because after opening a bad report，You have to take the defective product and ask this boss to sign it，The boss signed，Procurement is also notified；Suppliers come to the factory to rework and confirm the rework method，After the rework is completed, it will be re-inspected according to the standard and so on，Reject a batch，It takes more than the normal inspection of three batches。So，A lot of the time，When the inspector draws a small number of defective products，However, the number of defects has reached the standard of AQL rejection，It is still on the line with the qualified label，This is not right。 The inspector I brought with me before，basically，Every new inspector suffers such a loss：During the inspection, only a few defective products were found，The result is in the production process，Defective products broke out in batches，This leads to production shutdowns and other phenomena。So，When the sampling reaches the rejection level of AQL，Be sure to bill、reject。Some inspectors are afraid of the hassle of billing，After the bad is found，Procurement said，For this problem, I just call the supplier to come over and rework，Don't open a bill，It's troublesome because of billing。When this happens, inspectors are usually willing to help，and procurement to keep the problem down，As a result, the supplier did not deal with it in a timely manner，There are situations that lead to no material shutdown in the production line，Some materials have been fed for three days，Haven't signed the order yet, etc。The superior does not know about it，If the inspector is deemed to have not inspected the inspector, it will be said that the inspector has a timeliness problem。therefore，The inspector after the inspection is defective，Bills should be issued in a timely manner。 statement：This website is reprinted、share、statement、Views remain neutral，The purpose is only to convey more information，The copyright belongs to the original author。If the copyright of the work is involved，Please contact us，We will remove the content as soon as possible! ...

Dongjiang Times opened a breakfast house in a shopping mall on the first floor of a residential community in Dongping, an urban area，He was fined 10,000 yuan by the environmental protection department for failing to go through environmental protection approval procedures，The shopkeeper continued to operate despite the fine，Later, the environmental protection department filed the case again and issued an administrative penalty decision ordering the suspension of production。The owner Li was not convinced，The case was administratively reviewed、First instance、Second instance，The Huizhou Intermediate People's Court revoked the administrative penalty in the final instance。Recently，This case was selected as one of the "Top 10 Administrative Trial and State Compensation Cases of 2017" released by the High People's Court of Guangdong Province。 Facts of the case Opened a breakfast restaurant without environmental approval and was fined according to the judgment of the second instance，2015year，Li's daughter-in-law rented a stall in a shopping mall on the first floor of a garden in Dongping, an urban area, to run a breakfast house，The area is about 50 square meters，There is 1 steam stove in the kitchen。 May 27, 2015，The Huicheng District Bureau under the Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau received complaints from the masses and investigated，Making an Administrative Penalty Decision，Due to the existence of the breakfast house, the environmental protection approval procedures have not been completed，The fume prevention and control facilities that need to be built have not been completed、Not accepted，Unauthorized production(business)environmental violations，Order them to cease their illegal acts，and imposed a fine of 10,000 yuan。After paying the fine，The breakfast house continues to operate，and change the business license of the breakfast house，The operator was changed to Li，However, environmental approval procedures have not yet been processed。 After about 10 months，i.e. March 10, 2016，After an on-site investigation、After the hearing and other procedures，Huicheng District Branch of the Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau once again made an "administrative penalty decision"，Li was ordered to stop production。Li was not convinced，Apply to the Municipal People's Government for administrative reconsideration，The decision of the municipality to uphold the original administrative act after a written review。Li was not convinced，Sue to court，Request that the administrative penalty be revoked。 The owner of the shop was not told that he needed to do an environmental impact assessment, and there was no oil smoke exceeding the standard during the operation, Li said，When he set up the breakfast house, he had no idea what he needed to do with an EIA，In the process of obtaining an industrial and commercial business license in accordance with the law，There is no precondition for environmental impact registration by the relevant authorities。 Li said，He was unaware that running a small breakfast shop required an environmental impact registration。Tested by the environmental protection department on the spot，No fumes were found at the breakfast shop he runs、Noise exceeding the standard, etc，There is no environmental pollution。 The environmental protection department should not be put into production and use without environmental protection approval。The Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau said，When the law enforcement officers of the bureau conducted a law enforcement inspection of Li's breakfast house，It was found that the cooking exhaust gas generated by the kitchen was discharged through the smoke pipe to the sewer in front of the store，There is no environmental approval procedures，The environmental protection facilities that need to be built have not been completed、The act of putting into production without acceptance。 meantime，Take into account the cooking exhaust gases generated by the breakfast house、wastewater、noise and other comprehensive factors，Below the six reference burners identified as belonging to the environmentally sensitive area，An environmental impact registration form is required。The breakfast house operated by Li did not go through the relevant environmental protection approval procedures、After the acceptance of environmental protection facilities and in line with the "three simultaneous" system of environmental protection of construction projects，It should not be put into production。 Final Appeal: Revoke the 2016 "Administrative Penalty Decision" The Huicheng District People's Court rejected Li's litigation claim in the first-instance judgment，Li was dissatisfied and appealed。 Is the penalty imposed by the Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau reasonable? The Huizhou Intermediate People's Court held in the second instance，Li's violation of environmental protection after it was put into production，The administrative department of environmental protection may comply with the Law on the Prevention and Control of Noise Pollution、The relevant provisions of the "Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law" and the "Water Pollution Prevention and Control Law" shall be dealt with in accordance with the law，However, it cannot be uniformly characterized as a violation of the "three simultaneities" provisions；It is not reasonable to require Li to complete the construction of environmental protection facilities in accordance with the "three simultaneities" stipulated in the "Regulations on the Administration of Environmental Protection of Construction Projects".。 The second instance held that，In 2015, Mr. Li leased a garden shopping mall in Dongping to operate a breakfast house，Before that，The main project of the business premises, a garden shopping mall in Dongping, was completed in December 2006，That is to say, it is objectively impossible for Li to build environmental protection facilities that need to be built according to the requirements of the "three simultaneities".，Designed at the same time as the main project、Construction at the same time、Put into production at the same time"，It is also impossible to carry out the completion acceptance at the same time as the main project。When Li leased the building to open a breakfast house, the building had already been completed and accepted，The Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau punished him for failing to "three simultaneities".，Unreasonable。 The Huizhou Intermediate People's Court rendered its final judgment in accordance with the law in March last year，The "Administrative Penalty Decision" made by the Huicheng District Branch of the Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau on March 10, 2016 was revoked。 Recently，The Eastern Times reporter was informed，Li has passed the hearing organized by the local market supervision department this year，The expired industrial and commercial license was replaced in accordance with the law，and continues to operate a breakfast house in the shopping mall on the first floor of the community。 Typical significance: It not only promotes administration according to law, but also protects the rights and interests of the masses，The case adjudicated by the Huizhou Intermediate People's Court was selected as one of the "Top 10 Administrative Trial and State Compensation Cases in 2017" by the High People's Court of Guangdong Province。 "Legality should be the main premise for administrative organs to take specific administrative acts，At the same time, it takes into account the reasonableness。The Provincial High Court made an evaluation：The business project in this case is not a construction project that is the subject of environmental impact assessment，In fact, the operator is unable to complete the construction of environmental protection facilities in accordance with the "three simultaneous" requirements of the environmental impact assessment，It is unreasonable for an administrative authority to impose a penalty on the operator for failing to conduct an environmental impact assessment，It is also illegal。 On the one hand, the judgment in this case has a supervisory role in the enforcement of the administrative organs，It is conducive to promoting the administration of administrative organs according to law，On the other hand, it has also effectively protected the legitimate rights and interests of the people。 This group of texts: "Dongjiang Times" reporter Jiang Yonglong, correspondent Lu Siying, Zhou Zefeng ...

2018Announcement of the 15th National Standards of China，Approved the issuance of 27 national standards such as "Brake Linings for Automobiles" and 2 national standard modification lists。thereinto，Including the "Energy Efficiency Limit Values and Energy Efficiency Grades of Air Purifiers" GB that is of concern to the society 36893-2018。 The development of the national standard "Energy Efficiency Limits and Energy Efficiency Grades for Air Purifiers" was officially launched in January 2016，After preliminary preparations、Industry research、Standards drafting、Meeting discussions、Test comparison、Consultation and other stages，It took nearly 3 years to complete。 2018It was officially released on November 19，2019It was officially implemented on December 01。 The standard specifies the energy efficiency limits and energy efficiency levels of air purifiers，After the standard comes into effect, it will replace the current national recommended standard GB/T 18801-2015 Energy efficiency limits and energy efficiency level requirements in Air Purifiers。As of December 1, 2019，The energy efficiency limits and energy efficiency ratings of air purifiers sold in the domestic market in China will need to comply with the following requirements： The lead drafting units of the standard are China National Institute of Standardization and Shanghai Institute of Metrology and Testing Technology。 Tongji University is one of the member units of the Air Purifier (China) Industry Alliance、Guangdong Midea Environmental Electrical Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd、Lake Electric Green Energy Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd、Zhuhai Gree Electric Appliance Co., Ltd、Weikai Testing Technology Co., Ltd、Dongguan Yujie New Materials Co., Ltd、3M China Ltd、Daikin Air Conditioning (Shanghai) Co., Ltd、Shenzhen Dingxin Technology Co., Ltd、Guangdong Provincial Microbial Analysis and Testing Center、Xiamen Lamex Markor Air Purification Co., Ltd、Guangdong Panasonic Environmental System Co., Ltd、Philips (China) Investment Co., Ltd、Honeywell Automation & Control (China) Co., Ltd、Shanghai Aiqi Environmental Technology Engineering Co., Ltd、Foshan Shunde Apollo Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd、Shenzhen Kanghong Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd、Beijing Zero Micro Technology Co., Ltd、Zhongshan Shangpin Environmental Purification Technology Co., Ltd、Iosmith (China) Water Heater Co., Ltd. and others participated in the drafting of the standard。 Full text of the standard (not yet included) Source：Air Purifier Industry Alliance statement：This website is reprinted、share、statement、Views remain neutral，The purpose is only to convey more information，The copyright belongs to the original author。If the copyright of the work is involved，Please contact us，We will remove the content as soon as possible! ...