The hot-dip galvanizing workshop is resurrecting and committing crimes against the wind,was fined 1.5 million yuan

Environmental protection strikes hard,Thunderbolt means to control pollution! A hot-dip galvanizing workshop in Rugao was fined 1,500,000 yuan......   Recently,Rugao City thoroughly implements the central government、Provincial Environmental Protection Inspector Requirements,Solidly carry out the battle of pollution prevention and control,Earnestly grasp the "five industries" of chemical printing and dyeing and the "scattered pollution" rectification work,Accelerate the adjustment of industrial structure and industrial upgrading。 "Scattered and polluted" enterprises are scattered due to their distribution、Poor workmanship、Heavy pollution、Concealment depth and other features,It is mainly distributed in the urban-rural interface、Environmentally complex areas such as administrative boundaries and areas with weak supervision such as rural areas,The environmental impact is significant。Take the illegal hot-plating workshop as an example,Due to the legal and compliant treatment of production wastewater and continuous discharge standards,There is a high cost,In order to strive for greater profit margins,Some hot-dip workshops do not build environmental protection facilities、No relevant pollution control measures will be taken,Direct discharge of production wastewater without any treatment,Serious pollution of the environment,It brings harm to the production and life of the surrounding residents。 The following is a typical case of a "scattered and polluted" hot-dip galvanizing workshop in this city and committing a crime against the wind、Xie Moumou was once convicted of violating the "three simultaneous" system of environmental protection,Engaged in the production of hot-dip galvanizing processing projects without environmental protection completion acceptance, and was ordered to stop the production of hot-dip galvanizing projects by the Rugao Environmental Protection Bureau,A fine of RMB 40,000 was imposed。After refusal to execute,It was forced to stop production by the Rugao Municipal People's Court in December 2017。 December 19, 2017,According to the clues provided by the masses,Cao's hot-dip galvanizing workshop operated at his home in Chengbei Street, Rugao City, resumed production without authorization,The wastewater generated by the second cooling process in the production process is not treated by pollution prevention facilities,The wastewater is discharged into the pit well through an underground pipe,It is then discharged into the western river through underground pipes。The inspectors of the Rugao Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau immediately went to the scene to investigate together with the personnel of the Public Security Brigade of the Rugao Municipal Public Security Bureau。 After investigation,The total zinc concentration in the wastewater from the second cooling process of the hot-dip galvanizing workshop was 2.18mg/L,0.45 times exceeded;The total zinc concentration in the wastewater accumulated in the pit well was 295 mg/L,195.7 times more than the standard。The workshop is in the production process of hot-dip galvanizing processing,Spent acid will be produced、The acid residue is dumped directly into the west river while it rains。It has been identified by Nanjing University Environmental Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd:The cooling water emitted by the hot-dip galvanizing workshop is a toxic substance,In addition, the act of discharging excess cooling water into the river through underground pipes is a discharge of toxic substances from hidden pipes;The act of direct dumping of pickling waste is classified as direct dumping of hazardous waste。 According to the Supreme People's Court、The provisions of Article 1, Paragraph 4 and Article 1, Paragraph 5 of the Supreme People's Procuratorate's Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Handling of Criminal Cases of Environmental Pollution,Cao、Xie Moumou has been suspected of the crime of seriously polluting the environment,In accordance with the provisions of Article 22 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China,The Rugao Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau then transferred the relevant materials of the case to the public security organs for further investigation and handling。 The court heard that the Rugao Municipal People's Procuratorate charged the defendant Cao with the Gao Jian Huan Su (2018) No. 10 indictment、Xie Moumou committed the crime of polluting the environment,On July 9, 2018, he filed a public prosecution with the Rugao Municipal People's Court。 The prosecution argues,Defendant Cao、Xie Moumou's actions constituted the crime of polluting the environment;The case was a joint crime,Defendant Cao、Xie XX played a major role in the joint crime,All are principal offenders,shall be punished in accordance with all the crimes in which they participated。 The verdict is accordingly,The Rugao Municipal People's Court is in accordance with the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and the Supreme People's Court、Supreme People's Procuratorate's Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases of Environmental Pollution>Related Provisions,Judgment was rendered in the case: Defendant Cao X committed the crime of polluting the environment,He was sentenced to two years and three months in prison,and a fine of RMB 450,000; Defendant Xie XX committed the crime of polluting the environment,He was sentenced to two years' imprisonment,Suspended for three years,and a fine of RMB 450,000; Defendant Cao、Xie Moumou's illegal gains of 600,000 yuan jointly withdrawn,confiscate,Surrendered to the State Treasury。 Typical significance: The ecological environment is the foundation of human survival。Cao、Xie Moumou is greedy for his own selfish interests,It does not hesitate to harm the environmental rights and interests of citizens,Illegal release of toxic substances,Serious pollution of the environment。 "There are no thunderbolts,It is difficult to show the bodhisattva's heart。"For serious harm to the ecological environment、Criminal acts that seriously damage the ecological environment,If not to take a harsh crackdown,It is difficult to embody the bodhisattva's heart for the whole society,It is difficult to embody the bodhisattva's heart for future generations。 Cao was brought to justice for polluting the environment,It reflects the high-pressure situation of Rugao City's insistence on severe punishment and heavy punishment for environmental pollution crimes,It actively responds to the expectations of the masses for a better environment。The Rugao Environmental Protection Bureau will further strengthen its efforts to crack down on environmental violations and crimes,and through the innovation of regulatory systems and methods,Earnestly move the law enforcement checkpoint forward,Put risk management and control in the first place,So that there is nowhere to hide from environmental violations and crimes。 source:Rugao environmental protection

The "three simultaneities" of environmental protection are not protected,The company was penalized by the Environmental Protection Bureau under the "old law".,Initiating an administrative lawsuit,The original verdict was upheld by the court

The environmental protection equipment was put into production without completing the equipment and was fined 40,000 yuan,A grain processing enterprise in Nantong sued the Environmental Protection Bureau and lost the lawsuit Yangtze Evening News (correspondent Gu Jianbing, Liu Changhai, reporter Yu Yingjie) The company has not built supporting environmental protection facilities,Unauthorized production。After the environmental protection department discovers it, it will file a case for review,and ordered the suspension of production、A penalty of 40,000 yuan was decided。The company was not convinced,It is considered that the relevant provisions on which the penalty decision was based have been revised,The environmental protection department made a penalty decision based on the "old law" and applied the law incorrectly,and file an administrative lawsuit accordingly。10May 31st,The Nantong Intermediate People's Court upheld the final judgment of the first instance in this environmental administrative penalty case,The facts of the penalty decision made by the Rugao Environmental Protection Bureau are clear、The evidence is sufficient、The procedure is legitimate,Applicable law is correct,Penalties are appropriate,The plaintiff's claim was dismissed。 Zhongwei Company is a company engaged in rice processing in Rugao City, Jiangsu Province、Wholesale and retail businesses of pre-packaged food。2016April 22,The Rugao Municipal Administrative Examination and Approval Bureau approved the environmental impact report form for the expansion of the grain drying project of Zhongwei Company,The project is required to strictly implement the "three simultaneous" system,Implement various environmental protection measures in place,Ten working days before the trial production, fill in the "Environmental Protection Report Form for Trial Production of Construction Projects" and report to the Rugao Municipal Administrative Examination and Approval Bureau and the Environmental Protection Bureau for the record,Commissioned acceptance monitoring within three months of the trial production period,Complete the completion and acceptance of environmental protection projects。 2017June 13,When the law enforcement officers of the Rugao Environmental Protection Bureau went to Zhongwei Company for law enforcement inspection,It was found that the company's expanded grain drying project had been put into production in November 2016,However, environmental protection facilities have not been built。 2017July 16,The Rugao Environmental Protection Bureau filed a case against Zhongwei Company for violating the "three simultaneities" of environmental protection。October 12 of the same year,The Rugao Environmental Protection Bureau held a hearing based on the company's application。 2017October 20 ,Rugao Environmental Protection Bureau made the Gaohuan Penalty Zi [2017] No. 159 Administrative Penalty Decision (hereinafter referred to as the No. 159 Penalty Decision),It was determined that the company had not completed the supporting environmental protection facilities for the grain drying project,It was put into production in November 2016,Violation of the Regulations on the Administration of Environmental Protection of Construction Projects (effective November 29, 1998,hereinafter referred to as Article 20 of the 1998 Regulations、Article 23。In accordance with article 28 of the 1998 Regulations,Ordered the company to stop the production of the grain drying project,and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 40,000 yuan on Zhongwei Company。 Zhongwei Company thinks,The machines used in its grain drying project are inherently dust-removal,There is no dust effect on the surrounding environment,The Rugao Environmental Protection Bureau determined that the facts of its violation were unclear,Thin gruel。1998The regulations have been amended,It came into force on October 1, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 2017 Regulations),The Rugao Environmental Protection Bureau punished him under the 1998 Regulations, and applied the law incorrectly。 For this,Zhongkang Company filed an administrative lawsuit with the Hai'an Municipal People's Court,Request for revocation of Penalty Decision No. 159。 The Hai'an Court held in the trial,The existing facilities of Zhongwei Company did not meet the standards and requirements stipulated in the reply of the Rugao Municipal Administrative Examination and Approval Bureau,and it failed to provide evidence to prove that the facilities had been accepted,The facts of Zhongmai's violation of the law are clear。On the issue of the application of law in this case,After the Rugao Environmental Protection Bureau filed a case against Zhongfang Company's behavior,Before the Penalty Decision No. 159 was made,The State Council has revised the Regulations on the Administration of Environmental Protection of Construction Projects。The Rugao Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau follows the rule that "the provisions of the old law shall be applied to substantive issues".,It is not improper to characterize and punish the illegal acts of Zhongkang Company in accordance with the regulations before the amendment,Therefore, the court dismissed the litigation claim of Zhongfang Company。 The company was not convinced,Appeal to the court of second instance。The Nantong Intermediate People's Court upheld the original judgment after trial。 ■Wired Judges■ The legality of administrative acts is examined according to the "application of the old law to substantive issues" The main focus of controversy in this case is:,The "Regulations on the Administration of Environmental Protection of Construction Projects" after the investigation of the administrative punishment involved in the case、The penalty decision was amended before it was made,Is it legal for the Rugao Environmental Protection Bureau to make a penalty decision based on the regulations before the amendment? on this,The judge who presided over the case in the first instance、Tang Xiao, vice president of the administrative tribunal of the Hai'an Municipal Court, said,The Minutes of the Symposium of the Supreme People's Court on Issues Concerning the Application of Law and Norms in the Trial of Administrative Cases (Fa Fa No. 200496) have made it clear:The conduct of the administrative counterpart occurred before the implementation of the new law,Specific administrative acts are made after the implementation of the new law,When the people's courts review the legality of specific administrative acts,The provisions of the old law apply to substantive issues,Procedural issues are governed by the provisions of the new law,However, the following cases are excluded:(1) Law、Laws or regulations provide otherwise;(2) The application of the new law is more conducive to protecting the lawful rights and interests of the administrative counterpart;(3) The substantive provisions of the new law shall be applied according to the nature of the specific administrative act。 In this case,The plaintiff, Zhongwei Company, had not completed the supporting environmental protection facilities,The main project will be put into production,Whether under the 1998 Regulations or the 2017 Regulations,All of their actions constitute illegality。For the offense,1998Article 28 of the Regulations,Violation of the provisions of these Regulations,The environmental protection facilities that need to be built for the construction project have not been completed、It has not been accepted or the experience is unqualified,The main project is officially put into production or use...... Order to stop production or use,A fine of up to 100,000 yuan may be imposed。2017Paragraph 1 of Article 23 of the Regulations,Violation of the provisions of these Regulations,Environmental protection facilities that need to be built have not been completed、It has not been accepted or has failed to pass the acceptance,The construction project is put into production or use...... Order corrections to be made within a time limit,A fine of between 200,000 and 1,000,000 yuan shall be imposed;Failure to make corrections within the time limit,A fine of between 1 million and 2 million yuan shall be imposed;to the person in charge who is directly responsible and other responsible personnel,A fine of between 50,000 and 200,000 yuan shall be imposed;Causing major environmental pollution or ecological damage,Order to stop production or use,or report to the people's government with the right to approve for approval,Ordered to close。therefore,If the least serious circumstance is based on Article 23 of the 2017 Regulations, it will be ordered to make corrections within a time limit,and a fine of between 200,000 and 1,000,000 yuan,Penalties were imposed on the company,It will inevitably be heavier than the penalty result of Penalty Decision No. 159。Therefore, the Rugao Environmental Protection Bureau applied the 1998 regulations to punish Zhongwei Company,The extent of the penalty imposed on the company was not increased,And it embodies the principle of starting from the old and light,Comply with the rule that "the provisions of the old law apply to substantive issues".,Penalties are appropriate。 source: Yangtze Evening News statement:This website is reprinted、share、statement、Views remain neutral,The purpose is only to convey more information,The copyright belongs to the original author。If the copyright of the work is involved,Please contact us,We will remove the content as soon as possible!

Lou Qinjian and Wu Zhenglong attended the relevant activities of TSMC's Nanjing project

10May 31st,TSMC's Nanjing project, which has attracted much attention in the industry, officially announced the mass production,It has created a speed of "TSMC (Nanjing)" from construction to mass production within two years,This is another fruitful result of cross-strait industrial cooperation。Zhang Ping, vice chairman of the mainland side of the Cross-Strait Entrepreneurs Summit、Lou Qinjian, secretary of the provincial party committee、Provincial Governor Wu Zhenglong and others attended the relevant activities。 10On the afternoon of March 30,Lou Qinjian met with TSMC Chairman Liu Deyin and his party,On behalf of the Provincial Party Committee、The provincial government congratulated TSMC Nanjing on its mass production。Lou Qinjian said,The integrated circuit industry is the core of the information technology industry,It's basic、Leading and strategic role,The market demand is huge,It is we who optimize the industrial structure、Accelerate transformation and upgrading、Industries that prioritize high-quality development will be realized。Jiangsu is an important integrated circuit industry agglomeration area in mainland China,TSMC is a leading enterprise in the world's integrated circuit manufacturing industry,The cooperation between TSMC and Jiangsu will surely promote the further acceleration of related technological innovation and industries,Create a broader space for development。Lou Qinjian said,Jiangsu will, as always, fully support TSMC to accelerate the construction of the Nanjing project,Protect intellectual property rights,Create a good environment,Convenience、highly efficient、Excellent service,It is hoped that TSMC will look at market demand dynamically,Seize the opportunity、Take advantage of the situation,Accelerate the construction of the second phase of the project,Make TSMC Nanjing a successful model of cross-strait industrial cooperation,Enhance the overall competitiveness of the integrated circuit industry on both sides of the strait in the process of mutual benefit and win-win results。 Wu Zhenglong said in his speech,TSMC Nanjing achieved mass production,It is a big event for TSMC,It is also a great event in Jiangsu。Jiangsu、Nanjing and TSMC work together,It not only created the TSMC speed of major project construction in Nanjing,Moreover, it has created the Nanjing speed of TSMC's integrated circuit project construction。A modern integrated circuit factory was completed and put into operation as scheduled,It is a testament to the far-sighted decision-making of TSMC's senior team,It is also a successful example of the integrated development of industries on both sides of the strait and a witness of the family affection of compatriots on both sides of the strait。current,We are guided by Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era,Vigorously promote the "six high quality",Accelerate the construction of a "strong, rich, beautiful and high" new Jiangsu,The prospects for the economic and social integration and development of Jiangsu and Taiwan are broader。We will continue to fully support TSMC's development in Jiangsu,Strive to create a benchmark for the integrated development of Jiangsu and Taiwan。We will adhere to the concept of "one family on both sides of the strait.",Create a better business environment,Share the opportunities of Jiangsu's high-quality development with Taiwan compatriots,Greater efforts should be made to enhance the well-being of compatriots on both sides of the strait。 Liu Deyin thanked the Jiangsu Provincial Party Committee in his speech at the meeting and related activities、The provincial government attaches great importance to and cares for TSMC's Nanjing project。He said,TSMC's Nanjing project was put into mass production,It shows that cross-strait industrial cooperation has achieved new results。TSMC is very optimistic about the development of Jiangsu,Full confidence in the rapid development of the semiconductor industry in mainland China,TSMC Nanjing will be built into an important base for TSMC's global operations,Strive to use the most advanced technology、The optimal business model helps Jiangsu build a highland for the semiconductor industry,It will play a more active role in promoting mutually beneficial economic cooperation between the Soviet Union and Taiwan。 TSMC is the world's largest professional integrated circuit manufacturing services company,TSMC's Nanjing project was officially settled in Nanjing in March 2016,In July of the same year, the first phase of the project officially started construction。Since the start of construction,In the Cross-Strait Entrepreneur Summit Council and the Provincial Party Committee、With the strong support of the provincial government and the city of Nanjing,The project is progressing well,In September last year,TSMC Nanjing Company held a machine entry ceremony。 Provincial and Nanjing City leader Yang Yue、Fan Jinlong、Zhang Jinghua、Ma Qiulin、Guo Yuanqiang、Lan Shaomin,Chen Ruilong, secretary general of the Taiwan side of the Cross-Strait Entrepreneurs Summit,Chen Jiangang, Secretary-General of the Provincial Government, attended relevant activities or participated in the meeting。

Provincial Environmental Protection Inspectorate Handover Issue,17A county-level cadre was dealt with

17 county-level cadres in Xinyu, Pingxiang Township, Jiujiang were dealt with for 30 days,The reporter learned from the official website of the provincial government,Jiujiang City、Pingxiang City、Xinyu City reported on the transfer of responsibility for ecological and environmental damage by the provincial environmental protection inspectors,At the same time, relevant typical cases were reported。A total of 60 cadres were held accountable in the three districted cities,Among them, there are 17 cadres at the county and department level,There are 43 section-level cadres。 2017The period from May to June,Jiangxi Provincial Environmental Protection Supervision Team was stationed in Jiujiang、Pingxiang、Xinyu and other districted cities carry out environmental protection inspection work,and handed over clues on the investigation of responsibility for ecological and environmental damage to the districted cities where they are located,It is required that an investigation and handling be conducted in accordance with laws and regulations。 Jiujiang Nature Reserve Construction Hydropower Project Shui Xiu was held criminally responsible for the construction of hydropower projects at the time of water repair, from May 17 to June 9, 2017,The second environmental protection inspection team of Jiangxi Province carried out environmental protection inspection work in Jiujiang City,And on August 11, 2017, it handed over to the city a clue on the investigation of responsibility for ecological and environmental damage,It is required that an investigation and handling be conducted in accordance with laws and regulations。 According to the results of the investigation,A total of 24 responsible personnel have been held accountable in Jiujiang City。Among them, there are 7 cadres at the county and department level,There are 17 section-level cadres;1 person was given an administrative demerit,1 person was seriously warned in the party,10 people were given warnings,Admonished 12 people。 Case 1: The 30MW fishery-photovoltaic complementary power generation project of Ruichang Hongyuan Photovoltaic Power Generation Co., Ltd. encroached on 490 acres of provincial important wetlands in Dar Lake,It has been built and connected to the grid for power generation。The Ruichang Municipal Government and relevant functional departments have not obtained the approval procedures for the use of wetlands by the provincial forestry department for the project,The groundbreaking ceremony was held without authorization,And actively carry out project construction,Failure to stop illegal acts。According to the cadre management authority,It was given to Cheng Shigui, deputy mayor of Ruichang Municipal Government, and members of the party group of the municipal government、Deputy county-level cadres talked about Taijun's admonition and punishment;Chen Dechun, director of the Ruichang Forestry Bureau, was given an intra-party warning;Fan Hui, the head of the Wujiao Township Government, was given an administrative warning。 Case 2: Xiushui County illegally constructed the Tangfang Hydropower Project within the experimental area of Xiuheyuan Wumeishan Nature Reserve,Fu Jianshun, then member of the Standing Committee of the Xiushui County Party Committee, was the leader in charge of the project,Leaders are responsible (they have been held criminally responsible);Xiushui County Forestry Bureau、Xiushui County Forestry Group、Xiushui County Maozhushan Forest Farm and other related units,No feedback was provided in the early stages of the project,As a result, the project was approved and then started construction,And in December 2011, it generated electricity。It was given to Gao Qinghua, head of Xiushui County Forestry Group、Fan Lianggui, deputy director of the Xiushui County Forestry Bureau, was given an intra-party warning,Wu Yuanqing, the person in charge of the Maozhushan Forest Farm in Xiushui County, was given a serious warning within the party。 Pingxiang issued an approval for the resort construction project in violation of regulations, and two cadres in the Wugong Mountain Scenic Area were punished from May 12 to June 4, 2017,The third environmental protection inspection team of Jiangxi Province carried out environmental protection inspection work in Pingxiang City,On August 10, 2017, the city handed over clues on the investigation of responsibility for ecological and environmental damage,It is required that an investigation and handling be conducted in accordance with laws and regulations。 Pingxiang Municipal Party Committee、A total of 19 responsible persons were held accountable by the municipal government,Among them, there are 2 cadres at the county and department level,There are 17 section-level cadres;5 people were given administrative warnings,Admonished and talked to 14 people,Two typical cases were also reported。 Case 1: Wugong Mountain Scenic Area Agriculture and Rural Affairs Office issued an environmental impact approval for a resort construction project in violation of regulations。2013October,Wang Guangming, director of the Wugong Mountain Agricultural Office (and the function of the Environmental Protection Office), and Liu Yanghua, the deputy director at the time, issued the "Reply to the Environmental Impact Registration Form of the Wugong Mountain No. 1 Resort Construction Project" in violation of regulations,There were adverse effects。Wang Guangming was punished with a government affairs warning,Liu Yanghua was admonished and dealt with。 Case 2 2017,The provincial environmental protection inspection team found,The Pingxiang Municipal Water Affairs Bureau has damaged and leaked sewage pipes in the river,It was found that the disposal was not timely;Damage to municipal sewage branches、Direct discharge of domestic sewage、domestic garbage into the river and other problems,Coordination and supervision of relevant units are insufficient,As a result, the water quality of the Pingshui River has declined。on this,Member of the Party Committee of the Municipal Water Affairs Bureau、Lai Jun, head of the Municipal Water Administration Supervision Detachment, has the main leadership responsibility,Huang Xinde, head of the water supply and drainage section, is directly responsible。Lai Jun was admonished and dealt with;Huang Xinde was punished with a government affairs warning。 Xinyu Sewage Treatment Plant Looks Like a Decoration 4 Section-level Cadres Held Accountable From May 12 to June 4, 2017,The first environmental protection inspection team of Jiangxi Province carried out environmental protection inspection work in Xinyu City,On August 10, 2017, the city handed over clues on the investigation of responsibility for ecological and environmental damage,It is required that an investigation and handling be conducted in accordance with laws and regulations。 By the Xinyu Municipal Party Committee、City Hall Research,It was decided to hold 17 responsible persons accountable。thereinto,There are 8 cadres at the county and department level,There are 9 section-level cadres;7 people were given party discipline and government sanctions,Admonish and talk to 10 people,Two typical cases were also reported。 Case 1 Read More …

Direct discharge of wastewater,The person in charge of sewage treatment was detained

10On the morning of January 29,It was learned from the Changde City Environmental Supervision Detachment,1Until September,A total of 215 environmental violations were investigated and dealt with in Changde City,The fine amounted to about 17.48 million yuan,2 cases were sealed and seized,15 cases of suspension of production and rectification,There were 33 cases of administrative detention。 The "Implementation Plan for Random Sampling of Daily Environmental Supervision of Pollution Sources in Changde City" implemented in June this year,Standardize the city's information on law enforcement personnel participating in random spot checks,The list of enterprises participating in random inspections has been supplemented,And in accordance with the proportion stipulated by the provincial department,85 enterprises in the city were inspected,Among them, there are 74 general enterprises、There are 11 key pollution sources。Supervisory monitoring exceeds the standard,Investigate and deal with it in accordance with the law as soon as,Abnormal and excessive online monitoring data,The first warning、Investigation and verification、Handled in accordance with the law,And supervise the rectification in place。 Continued high-pressure environmental law enforcement,It has effectively promoted the solution of a number of outstanding environmental problems。Hanshou Tianxin Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd. aquaculture wastewater is directly discharged without sewage treatment facilities,A submersible pump is used to pass the highly concentrated biogas slurry through a private dark pipe,A portion is discharged into nearby planting plots,Part of it is discharged to the Gaojiaba barrage,It eventually flows into Xiaojia Lake,Seriously pollute the surrounding environment。After the company's environmental violations were verified,The environmental supervision department ordered it to immediately dismantle the hidden pipe in accordance with the law,and imposed a fine of 600,000 yuan on the enterprise,At the same time, the case was transferred to the public security organs;The public security organ issued an administrative penalty decision against the company,To Jiang, the general manager of the company、Luo, the person in charge of sewage treatment, made a decision to impose a penalty of 7 days of administrative detention。Hunan Tianjie Paper Co., Ltd. is not in place due to sludge disposal,Ordered to immediately cease the violation,Strictly follow the EIA report and its approval requirements,Take effective preventive measures,Prevent environmental pollution caused by solid waste,and was given an administrative penalty of 30,000 yuan in accordance with the law。   source:Hunan Provincial People's Government Statement:This website is reprinted、share、statement、Views remain neutral,The purpose is only to convey more information,The copyright belongs to the original author。If the copyright of the work is involved,Please contact us,We will remove the content as soon as possible!